A Review Of trade secret case law
A Review Of trade secret case law
Blog Article
Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Case regulation is specific for the jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. As an example, a ruling in a California appellate court would not ordinarily be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
If the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by possibly party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and progress according for the legislation. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 with the Constitution. Read more
This is because transfer orders are typically deemed within the administrative discretion on the employer. However, there could be exceptions in cases where the transfer is inspired by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more
For that foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order regarding cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight specified to any reported judgment could rely upon the reputation of both the reporter and the judges.[7]
The law as established in previous court rulings; like common regulation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf from the boy by a guardian advert litem, against DCFS, the social worker, along with the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for a dismissal based on absolute immunity, since they were all performing in their Work with DCFS.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Concerning the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 from the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice will not be served, the grievance petition may be dismissed. This is because service with the grievance notice is usually a mandatory prerequisite and also a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law demands that a grievance notice be served around the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In the event the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In case the organization is transprovincial.
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are the opinions that are filed on the day that the appellate court issues its decision and are frequently not the court's final opinion.
Problems or Errors For those who encounter any technical problems with this website (such as a negative link or possibly a portion check here of an opinion missing), please notify the eService Middle.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It is usually a effectively-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.